In Milman v. Feiger & Feiger, P.C. (6th Cir., No. 21-2685, 01/25/2023), Milman sued the employer law firm, alleging the employer violated the FMLA when it terminated her immediately after she requested unpaid leave to care of her son. The Sixth Circuit reversed and remanded the trial court’s order dismissing Milman’s FMLA claim. The record showed that during Milman’s time working from home, her son became ill with symptoms resembling COVID-19. She contacted the employer to request more time to work from home but the employer denied her request and demanded she return to the office. Her son’s condition did not improve, and Milman instead requested to take unpaid leave. The employer terminated Milman. On appeal, the court looked at whether Milman’s request for leave was a protected right under the FMLA. Here, Milman never actually took the unpaid leave – she only requested it. The court explained the FMLA requires employees to put their employer on notice of their desire to use their unpaid leave by making a formal request to the employer. To do so, the steps of the process created by the FMLA include the employee’s initial request for leave, which must be a protected activity under the FMLA. The court found Milman’s request for unpaid leave was protected. Further, the court noted the request to leave need not lead to entitlement to be protected.
Archives
- September 2024
- August 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- June 2023
- May 2023
- February 2023
- December 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- July 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- February 2018
- September 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
Categories
Recent Posts
- Sixth Circuit Affirms – and Reverses – on ADEA Discrimination and Harassment Claims
- Retaliatory Discharge Claim Not Covered by Arbitration Provision in Employee Confidentiality Agreement
- Employer Must Re-Open Union Facility Due to Unfair Labor Practice – Sixth Circuit
- Sixth Circuit Affirms Jury Verdict for Sexual Harassment
- Employee’s Title VII Claims Survive “Last Chance Agreement”