In Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. (S.Ct. No. 23-971, 2/26/25), the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held that voluntary dismissals under F.R.C.P. Rule 41(a) may constitute final orders under Rule 60(b), thus paving the way for previously dismissed claims to be reopened. Here, Waetzig filed suit for age discrimination, but after notice of an arbitration agreement, voluntarily dismissed the suit under Rule 41(a), which operated as without prejudice. After losing on summary judgment in arbitration – instead of filing a new action attacking the arbitration award – Waetzig filed a motion under the prior docket seeking to reopen the case under Rule 60(b) based on “mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect.” In reversing the Seventh Circuit, and without expressing an opinion on the merits of the plaintiff’s motion, the Court held that when the requirements of Rule 60(b) are satisfied, a district court “may” relieve a party from such a dismissal and reopen the case.
Archives
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- November 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- June 2023
- May 2023
- February 2023
- December 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- July 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- February 2018
- September 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
Categories
Recent Posts
- Sixth Circuit – Severability Clause Means Everything in Arbitration Agreement
- Tennessee Court of Appeals Speaks on Act Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Harassment Claims
- SCOTUS: It’s Not Over Until It’s Over
- Sixth Circuit Finds Seizure Disorder Renders Utility Worker a “Direct Threat” under ADA
- Sixth Circuit: If You Signed It – You Read It