In Lowe v. Walbro (6th Cir., No. 24-2011, 08/05/2025), a jury found that Kenneth Lowe was discharged because of his age. The trial court vacated the verdict, and the Sixth Circuit affirmed. Lowe’s position had been eliminated and he had no direct evidence of age discrimination. Additionally, the alleged ageist statements by his supervisor at the termination meeting were hearsay, and other comments constituted “stray remarks.” Further, there was no evidence presented that someone outside the protected class was treated differently, nor was Lowe’s position filled by anyone. Therefore, the Court found Lowe did not present sufficient evidence for a jury to find that age discrimination was the reason for his termination.
Sixth Circuit Affirms Vacatur of Jury Verdict in ADEA Case
